2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
No. 208, December 2011
No. 207, November 2011
No. 206, October 2011
No. 205, September 2011
No. 204, August 2011
No. 203, July 2011
No. 202, June 2011
No. 201, May 2011
No. 200, April 2011
No. 199, March 2011
No. 198, February 2011
No. 197, January 2011
2010
No. 196, December 2010
No. 195, November 2010
No. 194, October 2010
No. 193, September 2010
No. 192, August 2010
No. 191, July 2010
No. 190, June 2010
No. 189, May 2010
No. 188, April 2010
No. 187, March 2010
No. 186, February 2010
No. 185, January 2010
2009
No. 184, December 2009
No. 183, November 2009
No. 182, October 2009
No. 181, September 2009
No. 180, August 2009
No. 179, July 2009
No. 178, June 2009
No. 177, May 2009
No. 176, April 2009
No. 175, March 2009
No. 174, February 2009
No. 173, January 2009
2008
No. 172, December 2008
No. 171, November 2008
No. 170, October 2008
No. 169, September 2008
No. 168, August 2008
No. 167, July 2008
No. 166, June 2008
No. 165, May 2008
No. 164, April 2008
No. 163, March 2008
No. 162, February 2008
No. 161, January 2008
2007
No. 160, December 2007
No. 159, November 2007
No. 158, October 2007
No. 157, September 2007
No. 156, August 2007
No. 155, July 2007
No. 154, June 2007
No. 153, May 2007
No. 152, April 2007
No. 151, March 2007
No. 150, February 2007
No. 149, January 2007
2006
No. 148, December 2006
No. 147, November 2006
No. 146, October 2006
No. 145, September 2006
No. 144, August 2006
No. 143, July 2006
No. 142, June 2006
No. 141, May 2006
No. 140, April 2006
No. 139, March 2006
No. 138, February 2006
No. 137, January 2006
2005
No. 136, December 2005
No. 135, November 2005
No. 134, October 2005
No. 133, September 2005
No. 132, August 2005
No. 131, July 2005
No. 130, June 2005
No. 129, May 2005
No. 128, April 2005
No. 127, March 2005
No. 126, February 2005
No. 125, January 2005
2004
No. 124, December 2004
No. 123, November 2004
No. 122, October 2004
No. 121, September 2004
No. 120, August 2004
No. 119, July 2004
No. 118, June 2004
No. 117, May 2004
No. 116, April 2004
No. 115, March 2004
No. 114, February 2004
No. 113, January 2004
2003
No. 112, December 2003
No. 111, November 2003
No. 110, October 2003
No. 109, September 2003
No. 108, August 2003
No. 107, July 2003
No. 106, June 2003
No. 105, May 2003
No. 104, April 2003
No. 103, March 2003
No. 102, February 2003
No. 101, January 2003
2002
No. 100, December 2002
No. 99, November 2002
No. 98, October 2002
No. 97, September 2002
No. 96, August 2002
No. 95, July 2002
No. 94, June 2002
No. 93, May 2002
No. 92, April 2002
No. 91, March 2002
No. 90, February 2002
No. 89, January 2002
2001
No. 88, December 2001
No. 87, November 2001
No. 86, October 2001
No. 85, September 2001
No. 84, August 2001
No. 83, July 2001
No. 82, June 2001
No. 81, May 2001
No. 80, April 2001
No. 79, March 2001
No. 78, February 2001
No. 77, January 2001
2000
No. 76, December 2000
No. 75, November 2000
No. 74, October 2000
No. 73, September 2000
No. 72, August 2000
No. 71, July 2000
No. 70, June 2000
No. 69, May 2000
No. 68, April 2000
No. 67, March 2000
No. 66, February 2000
No. 65, January 2000
1999
No. 64, December 1999
No. 63, November 1999
No. 62, October 1999
No. 61, September 1999
No. 60, August 1999
No. 59, July 1999
No. 58, June 1999
No. 57, May 1999
No. 56, April 1999
No. 55, March 1999
No. 54, February 1999
No. 53, January 1999
1998
No. 52, December 1998
No. 51, November 1998
No. 50, October 1998
No. 49, September 1998
No. 48, August 1998
No. 47, July 1998
No. 46, June 1998
No. 45, May 1998
No. 44, April 1998
No. 43, March 1998
No. 42, February 1998
No. 41, January 1998
1997
No. 40, December 1997
No. 39, November 1997
No. 38, October 1997
No. 37, September 1997
No. 36, August 1997
No. 35, July 1997
No. 34, June 1997
No. 33, May 1997
No. 32, April 1997
No. 31, March 1997
No. 30, February 1997
No. 29, January 1997
1996
No. 28, December 1996
No. 27, November 1996
No. 26, October 1996
No. 25, September 1996
No. 24, August 1996
No. 23, July 1996
No. 22, June 1996
No. 21, May 1996
No. 20, April 1996
No. 19, March 1996
No. 18, February 1996
No. 17, January 1996
1995
No. 16, December 1995
No. 15, November 1995
No. 14, October 1995
No. 13, September 1995
No. 12, August 1995
No. 11, July 1995
No. 10, June 1995
No. 09, May 1995
No. 08, April 1995
No. 07, March 1995
No. 06, February 1995
No. 05, January 1995
1994
More
|
Vol. 22(4) , October 2015 |
|
|
|
Investigating Factors Affecting Capital Structure of Equitized State-Owned Enterprises in Ho Chi Minh City
(pages 92-116)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.04
Abstract
Using panel data along with the application of Pooled OLS, FEM, and REM estimates, this study conducts an investigation into the effects of a series of factors, namely state ownership, size, tangible assets, growth, return on assets (ROA),
effective tax rate, and liquidity, on capital structure of 165 HCMC-based equitized state-owned enterprises (SOEs),
categorized into three groups over the 2008–2012 period. As suggested by the findings, tangible assets, ROA, and liquidity are negatively related to leverage ratio and short-term debt ratio for the three groups of enterprises. In terms of firm size, there exists a positive correlation with leverage ratio and short-term debt ratio for Group 1 and 2 but a negative correlation with short-term debt ratio for the case of Group 3.
State Budget Balance, Public Debt, and International Norms
(pages 51-75)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.05
Abstract
A fiscal sustainability model requires that budget revenues and expenditures be in balance while government budget constraints, ensured. Yet, it becomes problematic while failing to address the dynamism of the budget constraints, associated with the government’s role (i.e. extending its intervention may affect public debt and finance). On adopting approaches by Trehan and Walsh (1991) and Hakkio and Rush (1991),
which empirically tests cointegration between government revenues and its spending, this study’s aim is to assess the issue of public debt and fiscal sustainability in Vietnam. The findings, on the ground of analyzing institutional factors, demonstrate that no sustainability, as well as potential risk, is reflected by Vietnam’s public debt and fiscal policy.
Export Barriers and Export Performance of Vietnamese Seafood Firms Targeting International Markets
(pages 117-141)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.06
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify key export barriers and their impact on performance of Vietnamese seafood firms with their export to the US market. By reviewing the literature and using expert opinions, five factors of the export barriers can be identified, including product, price, distribution, logistics, and promotion. A structured questionnaire is used to survey managers of 152 seafood firms, and exploratory factor analysis, used to categorize variables in five barrier dimensions. Then, the development of linear regression aims to determine which barrier has a greater negative effect on export performance. The empirical results suggest that except for promotion, the other barriers have significantly negative impact on export performance. Based on the relative importance of the different marketing barriers, seafood firms should firstly focus on quality improvements to improve their performance.
Factors Influencing Capital Structure of Vietnam's Real Estate Enterprises: A Move from Static to Dynamic Models
(pages 76-91)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.07
Abstract
In this study, which investigates the determinants of capital structure of Vietnam’s listed real estate companies, we conduct a comparative analysis of static and dynamic models, finding out several factors affecting the capital structure. By applying panel data for 47 listed companies in the real estate domain from 2008 to 2013, we find that static panel models and dynamic estimators provide significantly different results. To finally identify the capital structure determinants, we then employ the system-GMM estimation. The empirical results indicate that the pecking order theory dominates the static trade-off theory as for the Vietnam’s listed real estate companies, which are also found to partially adjust their capital structure toward the target capital structure at a low speed (α = 0.452),
implying that these have to face quite large adjustment costs.
The Impact of Oil Prices on the Economy of Vietnam
(pages 142-159)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.01
Abstract
In this paper we study the relationship between oil prices and macroeconomic performance by investigating the impact of oil price shocks on key macroeconomic variables of Vietnam over the 2001–2012 period. In order to test the relationship between oil prices and the value of industrial production, we use cointegration method to consider the long-term relationship and Error Correction Model (ECM) to ponder the short-term one. The test results show that the price of oil and the value of industrial production in Vietnam are positively correlated in the long term, whereas in the short term the volatility of oil prices in the last two months will negatively affect the fluctuation in the value of the current industrial production.
Determinants of Inflation in Vietnam: A VECM Approach
(pages 26-50)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.02
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the main determinants of inflation in Vietnam during the period from 2002Q1 to 2013Q2. The cointegration theory and the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) approach are used to examine the impact of domestic credit, interest rate, budget deficit, and crude oil prices on inflation in both long and short terms. The results show that while there are long-term relations among inflation and the others, such factors as oil prices, domestic credit, and interest rate, in the short run, have no impact on fluctuations of inflation. Particularly, the budget deficit itself actually has a short-run impact, but its level is fundamentally weak. The cause of the current inflation is mainly due to public's expectations of the inflation in the last period. Although the error correction, from the long-run relationship, has affected inflation in the short run, the coefficient is small and insignificant. In other words, it means that the speed of the adjustment is very low or near zero. This also implies that once the relationship among inflation, domestic credit, interest rate, budget deficit, and crude oil prices deviate from the long-term trend, it will take the economy a lot of time to return to the equilibrium state.
Vietnam and Threshold Conditions in the Process of Global Financial Integration
(pages 02-25)
Version of Record online: 30 Oct 2020 | DOI: 10.24311/jabes/2015.22.4.03
Abstract
The global financial crisis, once again, has ignited several intense debates over financial globalization merits, particularly for developing countries. There are probably a number of initial threshold conditions to be attained before substantial benefits may be reaped, and the risks of capital account liberalization, minimized. This article takes into account a series of empirical framework typifying these threshold conditions, estimating essential ones and accordingly proposing a few policy implications. Empirical evidence demonstrates that there exist specific thresholds in such variables with significant effects on the nexus between financial integration and growth, including those as clearly identifiable as financial depth and institutional quality. It is also shown by the findings that Vietnam’s financial development has preliminarily satisfied the necessary conditions for efficient financial integration. In contrast, the institutional quality threshold remains far distant.
|
|