2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
No. 208, December 2011
No. 207, November 2011
No. 206, October 2011
No. 205, September 2011
No. 204, August 2011
No. 203, July 2011
No. 202, June 2011
No. 201, May 2011
No. 200, April 2011
No. 199, March 2011
No. 198, February 2011
No. 197, January 2011
2010
No. 196, December 2010
No. 195, November 2010
No. 194, October 2010
No. 193, September 2010
No. 192, August 2010
No. 191, July 2010
No. 190, June 2010
No. 189, May 2010
No. 188, April 2010
No. 187, March 2010
No. 186, February 2010
No. 185, January 2010
2009
No. 184, December 2009
No. 183, November 2009
No. 182, October 2009
No. 181, September 2009
No. 180, August 2009
No. 179, July 2009
No. 178, June 2009
No. 177, May 2009
No. 176, April 2009
No. 175, March 2009
No. 174, February 2009
No. 173, January 2009
2008
No. 172, December 2008
No. 171, November 2008
No. 170, October 2008
No. 169, September 2008
No. 168, August 2008
No. 167, July 2008
No. 166, June 2008
No. 165, May 2008
No. 164, April 2008
No. 163, March 2008
No. 162, February 2008
No. 161, January 2008
2007
No. 160, December 2007
No. 159, November 2007
No. 158, October 2007
No. 157, September 2007
No. 156, August 2007
No. 155, July 2007
No. 154, June 2007
No. 153, May 2007
No. 152, April 2007
No. 151, March 2007
No. 150, February 2007
No. 149, January 2007
2006
No. 148, December 2006
No. 147, November 2006
No. 146, October 2006
No. 145, September 2006
No. 144, August 2006
No. 143, July 2006
No. 142, June 2006
No. 141, May 2006
No. 140, April 2006
No. 139, March 2006
No. 138, February 2006
No. 137, January 2006
2005
No. 136, December 2005
No. 135, November 2005
No. 134, October 2005
No. 133, September 2005
No. 132, August 2005
No. 131, July 2005
No. 130, June 2005
No. 129, May 2005
No. 128, April 2005
No. 127, March 2005
No. 126, February 2005
No. 125, January 2005
2004
No. 124, December 2004
No. 123, November 2004
No. 122, October 2004
No. 121, September 2004
No. 120, August 2004
No. 119, July 2004
No. 118, June 2004
No. 117, May 2004
No. 116, April 2004
No. 115, March 2004
No. 114, February 2004
No. 113, January 2004
2003
No. 112, December 2003
No. 111, November 2003
No. 110, October 2003
No. 109, September 2003
No. 108, August 2003
No. 107, July 2003
No. 106, June 2003
No. 105, May 2003
No. 104, April 2003
No. 103, March 2003
No. 102, February 2003
No. 101, January 2003
2002
No. 100, December 2002
No. 99, November 2002
No. 98, October 2002
No. 97, September 2002
No. 96, August 2002
No. 95, July 2002
No. 94, June 2002
No. 93, May 2002
No. 92, April 2002
No. 91, March 2002
No. 90, February 2002
No. 89, January 2002
2001
No. 88, December 2001
No. 87, November 2001
No. 86, October 2001
No. 85, September 2001
No. 84, August 2001
No. 83, July 2001
No. 82, June 2001
No. 81, May 2001
No. 80, April 2001
No. 79, March 2001
No. 78, February 2001
No. 77, January 2001
2000
No. 76, December 2000
No. 75, November 2000
No. 74, October 2000
No. 73, September 2000
No. 72, August 2000
No. 71, July 2000
No. 70, June 2000
No. 69, May 2000
No. 68, April 2000
No. 67, March 2000
No. 66, February 2000
No. 65, January 2000
1999
No. 64, December 1999
No. 63, November 1999
No. 62, October 1999
No. 61, September 1999
No. 60, August 1999
No. 59, July 1999
No. 58, June 1999
No. 57, May 1999
No. 56, April 1999
No. 55, March 1999
No. 54, February 1999
No. 53, January 1999
1998
No. 52, December 1998
No. 51, November 1998
No. 50, October 1998
No. 49, September 1998
No. 48, August 1998
No. 47, July 1998
No. 46, June 1998
No. 45, May 1998
No. 44, April 1998
No. 43, March 1998
No. 42, February 1998
No. 41, January 1998
1997
No. 40, December 1997
No. 39, November 1997
No. 38, October 1997
No. 37, September 1997
No. 36, August 1997
No. 35, July 1997
No. 34, June 1997
No. 33, May 1997
No. 32, April 1997
No. 31, March 1997
No. 30, February 1997
No. 29, January 1997
1996
No. 28, December 1996
No. 27, November 1996
No. 26, October 1996
No. 25, September 1996
No. 24, August 1996
No. 23, July 1996
No. 22, June 1996
No. 21, May 1996
No. 20, April 1996
No. 19, March 1996
No. 18, February 1996
No. 17, January 1996
1995
No. 16, December 1995
No. 15, November 1995
No. 14, October 1995
No. 13, September 1995
No. 12, August 1995
No. 11, July 1995
No. 10, June 1995
No. 09, May 1995
No. 08, April 1995
No. 07, March 1995
No. 06, February 1995
No. 05, January 1995
1994
More
|
No. 212 , April 2012 |
|
|
|
Applying the Probit and Tobit Models in Examining Factors Affecting the Access by Kiên Giang Farming Households to Bank Loans
(pages 52-58)
ĐẶNG THANH SƠN
Version of Record online: 16 Aug 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
Rural credit takes a crucial part in developing a backward small-sized agricultural production into a commercial production. Rural credit itself is also influenced by various factors. The present paper employs the Probit and Tobit models to analyze factors hindering households in Ki?n Giang Province from accessing bank loans. The findings show that the more assets households possess, the easier they can secure a bank loan. Apparently, banks merely lend the money to households on the basis of their mortgaged assets but not the effectiveness of their production project. Such findings are one of scientific evidences helping researchers, banks, and decision-makers propose an appropriate policy for the sustainable development of Ki?n Giang Province. It also helps farmers improve their use of bank loans, increase their income and escape poverty, thereby supporting the sustainable development in Ki?n Giang.
Efficiency of Foreign-Invested Transport Companies
(pages 36-43)
PHAN THỊ LIÊN
Version of Record online: 09 Jun 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
The paper estimates technical performance of foreign-invested and local companies by analyzing a dataset for 11,210 companies in transport, warehousing and communication sector established by the GSO in 2010 and SFPF parameters. The results show that the average efficiency score of companies in this industry is 53.46%. These results also challenge the argument that performance of foreign-invested companies is always higher than that of local ones. On the contrary, type of companies is the main factor that affects the performance of foreign-invested companies in Vietnam JEL classification: F23, D24, C23.
The Marketing Approach to FDI Attraction
(pages 44-51)
NGUYỄN QUỐC NGHI & NGUYỄN HỮU THUẬN
Version of Record online: 09 Jun 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
In the period 2000-2010, the foreign sector witnessed a quantitative and qualitative rise, becoming a crucial part of Vietnam?s economy. Foreign direct investment (FDI) accounts for around 20% to 30% of the gross investment. In past years, attention has been only paid to the number of FDI projects and their registered capital, instead of their quality. Moreover, together with shortcomings in the infrastructure, inconsistency in investment attraction policy and inefficient promotion and communication policies made Vietnam?s business climate less attractive in the eyes of foreign investors. Therefore, from the marketing approach, the paper is to extend several measures to improve the FDI attraction in Vietnam, making it an ideal business environment for both local and foreign investors.
Preconditions for Reform in Vietnam's Model of Economic Growth
(pages 10-17)
ĐỖ PHÚ TRẦN TÌNH
Version of Record online: 09 Jun 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
VCP VI Congress witnessed a change in economic thought that aimed at increasing the production. The Congress provided a guidance for an extensive model of economic growth. In fact, this model produced various positive results, mobilizing all possible resources for production and satisfying demands for food and employment. Prolonged dependence on this model, however, led to many shortcomings: unstable growth rate, waste of natural resources, environmental pollution, poor competitiveness and unstable balances of trade and payments. Seeking for and changing the model of economic growth, therefore, has become a matter of great urgency to Vietnam today
Developing a Fuel Futures Market for Hedging Risks of Price Fluctuation in Vietnam
(pages 18-27)
NGUYỄN THỊ LIÊN HOA & CÁI PHÚC THIÊN KHOA
Version of Record online: 09 Jun 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
The paper aims at analyzing recent fluctuations in the fuel prices in the world in general and in Vietnam in particular. The author also reviews strengths and weaknesses of derivatives which have been thus far employed to prevent risks to the fuel prices in Vietnam?s market; and then recommends a model of fuel futures market for Vietnam. Hopefully, the construction and operation of such futures market will help predict and prevent fluctuations in the fuel prices, and improve the domestic futures market.
Restructuring Vietnam's Public Investment: Problems and Recommendations
(pages 02-09)
BÙI QUANG BÌNH
Version of Record online: 09 Jun 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
The government?s public investment plays a decisive role in the national infrastructural development and investment attraction. Yet it will be achievable on the condition that the structure of public investment is logical in terms of attraction and allocation of investment sources. As we can see, albeit public investment has greatly contributed to the national economic growth in past years, there are many flaws in its structure which have affected its efficiency. Therefore, the present paper aims to pinpoint drawbacks in the structure of public investment, the mechanism of management and utilization of public debts; and extend some suggestions for perfecting the structure of public investment in Vietnam.
Model for Identifying Profit Adjustment of Enterprises Listed on Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange
(pages 28-35)
PHẠM THỊ BÍCH VÂN
Version of Record online: 09 Jun 2019 | DOI:
Abstract
This paper analyzes the fit of the modified Jones model in identifying profit adjustment of 54 companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange (HOSE) in the accounting year of 2010. The research results show that the Modified Jones model is not effective in identifying profit adjustment of the enterprises listed on HOSE because of the coefficient measuring the fit of the model (R2 = 3.8%). After analyzing the macroeconomic environment of the HCMC stock market in particular and Vietnam in general, such variables as revenue, depreciation cost and provision cost are selected and added to the model, the R2 coefficient is found to increase to 40.9%. Moreover, all the variables are significant.
|
|