2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
No. 208, December 2011
No. 207, November 2011
No. 206, October 2011
No. 205, September 2011
No. 204, August 2011
No. 203, July 2011
No. 202, June 2011
No. 201, May 2011
No. 200, April 2011
No. 199, March 2011
No. 198, February 2011
No. 197, January 2011
2010
No. 196, December 2010
No. 195, November 2010
No. 194, October 2010
No. 193, September 2010
No. 192, August 2010
No. 191, July 2010
No. 190, June 2010
No. 189, May 2010
No. 188, April 2010
No. 187, March 2010
No. 186, February 2010
No. 185, January 2010
2009
No. 184, December 2009
No. 183, November 2009
No. 182, October 2009
No. 181, September 2009
No. 180, August 2009
No. 179, July 2009
No. 178, June 2009
No. 177, May 2009
No. 176, April 2009
No. 175, March 2009
No. 174, February 2009
No. 173, January 2009
2008
No. 172, December 2008
No. 171, November 2008
No. 170, October 2008
No. 169, September 2008
No. 168, August 2008
No. 167, July 2008
No. 166, June 2008
No. 165, May 2008
No. 164, April 2008
No. 163, March 2008
No. 162, February 2008
No. 161, January 2008
2007
No. 160, December 2007
No. 159, November 2007
No. 158, October 2007
No. 157, September 2007
No. 156, August 2007
No. 155, July 2007
No. 154, June 2007
No. 153, May 2007
No. 152, April 2007
No. 151, March 2007
No. 150, February 2007
No. 149, January 2007
2006
No. 148, December 2006
No. 147, November 2006
No. 146, October 2006
No. 145, September 2006
No. 144, August 2006
No. 143, July 2006
No. 142, June 2006
No. 141, May 2006
No. 140, April 2006
No. 139, March 2006
No. 138, February 2006
No. 137, January 2006
2005
No. 136, December 2005
No. 135, November 2005
No. 134, October 2005
No. 133, September 2005
No. 132, August 2005
No. 131, July 2005
No. 130, June 2005
No. 129, May 2005
No. 128, April 2005
No. 127, March 2005
No. 126, February 2005
No. 125, January 2005
2004
No. 124, December 2004
No. 123, November 2004
No. 122, October 2004
No. 121, September 2004
No. 120, August 2004
No. 119, July 2004
No. 118, June 2004
No. 117, May 2004
No. 116, April 2004
No. 115, March 2004
No. 114, February 2004
No. 113, January 2004
2003
No. 112, December 2003
No. 111, November 2003
No. 110, October 2003
No. 109, September 2003
No. 108, August 2003
No. 107, July 2003
No. 106, June 2003
No. 105, May 2003
No. 104, April 2003
No. 103, March 2003
No. 102, February 2003
No. 101, January 2003
2002
No. 100, December 2002
No. 99, November 2002
No. 98, October 2002
No. 97, September 2002
No. 96, August 2002
No. 95, July 2002
No. 94, June 2002
No. 93, May 2002
No. 92, April 2002
No. 91, March 2002
No. 90, February 2002
No. 89, January 2002
2001
No. 88, December 2001
No. 87, November 2001
No. 86, October 2001
No. 85, September 2001
No. 84, August 2001
No. 83, July 2001
No. 82, June 2001
No. 81, May 2001
No. 80, April 2001
No. 79, March 2001
No. 78, February 2001
No. 77, January 2001
2000
No. 76, December 2000
No. 75, November 2000
No. 74, October 2000
No. 73, September 2000
No. 72, August 2000
No. 71, July 2000
No. 70, June 2000
No. 69, May 2000
No. 68, April 2000
No. 67, March 2000
No. 66, February 2000
No. 65, January 2000
1999
No. 64, December 1999
No. 63, November 1999
No. 62, October 1999
No. 61, September 1999
No. 60, August 1999
No. 59, July 1999
No. 58, June 1999
No. 57, May 1999
No. 56, April 1999
No. 55, March 1999
No. 54, February 1999
No. 53, January 1999
1998
No. 52, December 1998
No. 51, November 1998
No. 50, October 1998
No. 49, September 1998
No. 48, August 1998
No. 47, July 1998
No. 46, June 1998
No. 45, May 1998
No. 44, April 1998
No. 43, March 1998
No. 42, February 1998
No. 41, January 1998
1997
No. 40, December 1997
No. 39, November 1997
No. 38, October 1997
No. 37, September 1997
No. 36, August 1997
No. 35, July 1997
No. 34, June 1997
No. 33, May 1997
No. 32, April 1997
No. 31, March 1997
No. 30, February 1997
No. 29, January 1997
1996
No. 28, December 1996
No. 27, November 1996
No. 26, October 1996
No. 25, September 1996
No. 24, August 1996
No. 23, July 1996
No. 22, June 1996
No. 21, May 1996
No. 20, April 1996
No. 19, March 1996
No. 18, February 1996
No. 17, January 1996
1995
No. 16, December 1995
No. 15, November 1995
No. 14, October 1995
No. 13, September 1995
No. 12, August 1995
No. 11, July 1995
No. 10, June 1995
No. 09, May 1995
No. 08, April 1995
No. 07, March 1995
No. 06, February 1995
No. 05, January 1995
1994
More
|
| Vol. 32(2) , June 2025 |
|
|
| |
Bridging the digital divide in the adoption of digital financial services
(pages 93–105)
Version of Record online: 03 Nov 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-04-2024-0183
Abstract
Purpose
As the digital economy expands, examining Malaysians’ acceptance of digital financial services (DFS) becomes imperative. The intricacies of DFS necessitate that consumers possess both financial knowledge (FK) and digital financial literacy (DFL) to utilize DFS effectively. This study examines FK and DFL across demographics and their impact on DFS usage, aiming to bridge the gap between intended and actual adoption.
Design/methodology/approach
An online survey garnered 525 responses. Given that FK and DFL, DFS usage intention and actual usage were ordinally measured, ordered logistic regression was employed.
Findings
Age aside, socio-demographics similarly affect financial knowledge and digital financial literacy. FK strongly drives both intended and actual digital financial service (DFS) use. However, the impact of DFL varies: awareness and understanding are key for both intention and use, but digital financial risk control knowledge is vital for actual use. Digital skills mainly influence intended, not actual, DFS usage.
Originality/value
This research distinguishes between the impacts of FK and DFL on DFS adoption. Moreover, the study decomposes digital financial literacy into three fundamental components, yielding valuable insights for targeting specific knowledge domains to enhance DFS implementation.
Understanding academic’s job stress through a moderated–mediation model of perceived supports and working hard
(pages 93–105)
Qui Ngoc Nguyen & Phuong Nguyen Quynh & Thanh Hang Pham
Version of Record online: 03 Nov 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-05-2024-0262
Abstract
Purpose
This research aims to develop a model built from the job demand-resource (JD-R) theory which explains the psychological mechanism that leads to academic work-related stress in an educational context. This study investigates the conditional effect of ambidextrous working hard through mediation paths and the moderating role of perceived support on these conditional effects.
Design/methodology/approach
Hypotheses were tested using cross-sectional data from 334 academics at Vietnamese institutions. Data were analysed within a moderated mediation model integrated from hierarchical regression.
Findings
The results revealed that while work engagement (WE) partially mediates the indirect effect of person-job fit (PJF) on job-related stress, workaholism (WKH) – as an escalated stage of working hard – fully explains the psychological mechanism with moderated integration from social supports.
Originality/value
This paper hopes to contribute to the growing educational literature exploring the complex, multi-conditional influences of personal and social factors to measure academics’ psychological changes that lead to a negative reaction at work.
An overshooting model of exchange rate determination and forecasting: a threshold regression approach
(pages 106–117)
Version of Record online: 03 Nov 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-11-2024-0502
Abstract
Purpose
This study examines the impact of structural shocks and policy interventions on the India/US exchange rate post the 1991 economic reforms in India. The study aims to improve forecasting accuracy by incorporating macroeconomic and microeconomic factors into the analysis using the threshold regression model (TRM), a nonlinear approach to estimation.
Design/methodology/approach
Extending Dornbusch’s (1976) overshooting model, the study incorporates micro factors, such as investor behaviour, beliefs and preferences, alongside traditional macroeconomic variables. Additionally, it introduces a capital control variable to assess monetary policy interventions. Using quarterly data from 1996Q2 to 2019Q3, TRM identifies two distinct economic regimes, providing a comprehensive understanding of India’s exchange rate dynamics.
Findings
The study reveals that macro and micro factors have varying effects on the exchange rate across regimes, reflecting India’s different economic conditions and policies. Furthermore, the TRM-based model achieves superior out-of-sample forecasting accuracy compared to the random walk model across all forecast horizons.
Originality/value
Unlike prior studies, where not all variables were deemed significant, our analysis demonstrates that all factors significantly influence the exchange rate. The innovative use of TRM deepens understanding of exchange rate behaviour, particularly in response to structural shocks and policy shifts. By identifying distinct economic regimes, the model offers insights into targeted policy measures tailored to India’s economic conditions, a previously unexplored perspective.
The impact of financial stress on consumer confidence: evidence from survey data
(pages 118–130)
Debasis Rooj & Anurag Banerjee & Reshmi Sengupta
Version of Record online: 03 Nov 2025 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-07-2024-0344
Abstract
Purpose
This paper explores the impact of financial stress (FS) on consumer confidence (CC) using survey data.
Design/methodology/approach
We use novel household-level survey data on CC by the Reserve Bank of India. FS data come from the financial stress index (FSI) released by the Tracking Asian Integration of Asian Development Bank. The sample period is 2015–2023. We align the lagged monthly values of FSI with the household-level data to uncover the impact of FS on household confidence in the economy.
Findings
Rising FS leads to increased pessimism among households regarding the state of the economy. Educated and well-off households are more sensitive to FS. Moreover, FS significantly impacts confidence regarding households’ own consumption basket and economic scenarios. A disaggregated analysis reveals that FS related to foreign exchange and debt spread causes greater pessimism among households than in the equity market and banking sector. Additionally, the impacts of FS are asymmetric, with above-average FS lowering household attitudes, while below-average FS increases optimism about the economy’s outlook.
Originality/value
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the impact of FS on household CC using household-level data for an emerging economy such as India. Micro-level data allow us to explore the impact of FS on household perceptions of current economic situations and future outlooks. We also uncover the impact of FS on households’ confidence in their own economic outcomes.
|
|